Andrej Nedic vs Hugo Ouzilou Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In their recent form, Nedic has slightly outperformed Ouzilou in second serve points won, achieving 41.88% compared to Ouzilou's 40.91%. Can this small difference influence the match outcome? It could offer Nedic a slight advantage.
• Nedic shows superior return game statistics, winning 46.79% of opponent's second serve points and 31.99% of first serve points, compared to Ouzilou's 35.57% and 27.37%, respectively. Is this a key factor? Yes, strong return skills can be crucial in close matches.
• Under pressure, Nedic edges out Ouzilou by saving 48.84% of breakpoints against 46.67% for Ouzilou. Does this indicate better mental resilience for Nedic? It suggests a slight edge in high-pressure scenarios.
• Over the last year, Nedic has a higher match win percentage at 74.65%, while Ouzilou has won 60% of their matches. What does this tell us? Nedic has been more successful overall.
• Both players favor clay courts, but Nedic's win rate on clay is higher at 68% versus Ouzilou's 60%. How might this impact the match? If played on clay, Nedic may leverage this advantage.
• Nedic has consistently faced lower-ranked opponents with an average rank of 415.66, compared to Ouzilou's 137.33. Does this weaken Nedic's perceived superiority? It suggests that Ouzilou may be better tested against stronger competition.
• In deciding set scenarios over the past year, Nedic has won 75% of matches, whereas Ouzilou has won 43%. If the match extends, who is more likely to prevail? Nedic shows greater endurance in crucial sets.
• When considering breakpoint conversion, Nedic excels with 42.08% success compared to Ouzilou's 31.82%. Could this stat decide the match? Effective breakpoint conversion could tip the balance in Nedic's favor.

Editorial Prediction (July 15, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming tennis match between Ouzilou and Nedic appears to be competitive, yet trends suggest Nedic holds a slight upper hand. In recent months, Nedic has demonstrated marginally better performance in both serving and returning metrics.

Nedic's slight edge in pressure situations and breakpoint conversions further highlight their potential advantage. Though both players have shown proficiency on clay, Nedic's record suggests superior adaptability and performance on this surface.

Moreover, Nedic's historical success in deciding sets may indicate greater resilience and stamina in extended match scenarios. While Ouzilou has faced more higher-ranked adversaries, which may speak to their competitiveness, Nedic's consistent match-winning record cannot be overlooked.

Taking these factors into account, it is likely that Nedic will emerge victorious in this upcoming match, based on the current statistics and performance insights.